Yellow Ribbon Tree
appen grocery
Northside Oral Surgery
appen dec 2010

E-cigs could be treated as tobacco


County plans ban on electronic devices in buildings



140302248
(click for larger version)
April 06, 2014
FORSYTH COUNTY, Ga. — Forsyth County wants to strengthen its law when it comes to electronic cigarettes, aligning it with tobacco products.

The devices, which are called e-cigs, or vaporizers, emit water vapor instead of smoke. These e-cigarettes have become more popular as traditional tobacco is banned or restricted increasingly at public places.

But local ordinances have not kept up with the new trend in smokeless cigarettes.

"We have limited regulation in the county as far as e-cigarettes," Forsyth County Attorney Ken Jarrard said.

Forsyth County Commissioner Cindy Jones Mills said something must be done.

Mills said that a constituent contacted her about someone smoking the vapor emitting device in a library.

It's currently not allowed to smoke electronic cigarettes at the library and traditional smoking is banned within 25 feet of the entrance to a government building.

"You're not outlawing it, you are saying go smoke where everyone else is smoking," Mills said.

The proposed ordinance could cover county buildings, but not school buildings. However, there's interest in enacting a similar ban at county schools, Mills said.

Commission Chairman R.J. "Pete" Amos said he supports a broader ban of e-cigarettes at all government buildings.

"We don't want you to do it inside a building, we want you to go to a designated area," Amos said.

County Attorney Jarrard said the parks do ban tobacco, but a new ordinance could cover the electronic devices.

Jarrard said that it's unknown whether second hand smoke from e-cigs or the vapor liquids are harmful to humans.

"There are a lot of unknowns," Jarrard said. "It's unclear when or whether the FDA(Food and Drug Administration) will regulate."

The recent legislative session produced House Bill 251, which if it becomes law, would extend the prohibition against minors selling, purchasing or possessing cigarettes to include e-cigarettes or vapor devices.

"We feel comfortable that Gov. Deal will allow that to become law and that give some prohibition," Jarrard said.

In addition to tobacco, Jarrard said the devices can also be used to consume illegal drugs.

"It's becoming another drug delivery device," Jarrard said "These are mechanism for cannabis oil."

http://1.usa.gov/1hJnItW

Read House Bill 251

FH 04-9-14

list visuals View images.
printPrint
emailEmail Link
CommentFeedback
shareShare

Tags: Government & News & Crime

  1. report print email
    Vape
    April 08, 2014 | 10:46 AM

    OHHHH NOOOO, a drug delivery device for Cannabis. Someone alert the feds that people smoke marijuana!!!! What a waste of tax dollars, just pass a law they have to smoke outside, don't try to compare vaping nicotine and Weed. One is dangerous to your health, the other isn't.

    Big Gipp
    Cumming
  2. report print email
    Seriously
    April 09, 2014 | 09:50 AM

    OK...I don't mind if they don't want it in buildings. That is fine. But, when these ignorant people try to attach other things, like drugs, to vaping...it rediculous. They want to scare people that know nothing about it. Paper can be used to roll up drugs and smoke it. Any device can be used in a way it is not intended. BUT IT IS NOT INTENDED, OR DESIGNED FOR IT. What of waste of my tax money paying these officials. I want someone with common sense. - Thanks

    Wasted TIme
    Cumming
  3. report print email
    Misinformed
    April 15, 2014 | 06:22 PM

    Mr. Jarrard is just wrong. The devices used to vape e-cig liquids are not the same as those used for cannabis consumption. They look the same, but are not compatible. Of course, facts don't matter when you're on a "righteous" public image crusade and playing on the fears of the ignorant, do they?

    Kidding Right?
    Smyrna
  4. report print email
    do some research
    April 27, 2014 | 05:35 PM

    Anything might be harmful. Why don't we outlaw diet coke? There is absolutely no findings, whatsoever, that there is a second hand risk to vaping as intended. There is, however, a risk of government losing tax revenue from the drop in tobacco sales tax income. It seems logical that they would go after the new alternative. Ms Mills is obviously using her political power to make a point. I wish that she had one...she doesn't. It would be great to put vapor out with cigarette smokers and get them all re-addicted.

    registered voter
    Cumming, GA
READER COMMENTS Submission
When posting feedback please be respectful. Be nice. :
* required value
Your Name*

Town*

Email (not shown on website)*

Subject*

Comment*

Verification*
Identify the animal




Biz Post
Coldwell Banker
RECENT CLASSIFIEDS
Office/ Business Equip./ Supplies

CLOTHING RACKS

August 26, 2014 | 10:25 AM
(3) collapsible, rolling »
Full-time

AutoCad drafting

August 26, 2014 | 10:02 AM
AutoCad 2D 2013 drafting »
Cemetery

3 Plots in Arlington Cemetery

August 25, 2014 | 06:17 PM
3 Plots in Arlington Cemetery, »

Georgetown Pediatrics
appen dec 2010 Duplicate