Yellow Ribbon Tree
appen grocery
Northside Oral Surgery
appen dec 2010

Public service or free speech? Residents should not have to choose


August 19, 2013
In today's world, it's hard to imagine the amazing vision our Founding Fathers had following the Revolutionary War. Rather than use their victory to create an oppressive government like the British monarchy, the Founders ratified a Constitution that redefined the role of government and the Rights of Man.

One of the most profound freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution is the right to free speech – the ability for any person to question their elected officials regardless of wealth, gender or race.

Sadly, the Johns Creek City Council does not hold this fundamental right in the same regard as our Founding Fathers.

As a member of the Johns Creek Planning Board, I am prohibited from addressing the City Council due to the language of the current ethics code.

This restriction could have been easily fixed had the council voted to approve an amendment offered by Councilmember Kelly Stewart during the Aug. 5 meeting.

Instead of rallying around the notion of free speech, the council overwhelmingly shut it down.

Why did they do this? As Councilmember Brad Raffensperger said, "We do not need division on anything. We need to be more unified … [have] more consensus."

Councilmember Bev Miller added, "I hesitate to make any changes at a request of someone who, it is clear to me, wants to talk about the investigation."

These are ridiculous notions, and they set a dangerous precedent for the residents of Johns Creek. Councilmembers should not view free speech through the lens of politics.

How are we to expect the best, most qualified people to volunteer their service to Johns Creek if the first requirement of that person is to waive their First Amendment right?

I have lived in our community for 14 years and, in my opinion, one of the major reasons people move to Johns Creek is that we operate under our millage rate.

If the council decided to raise taxes, I would be forced to choose between my position on the Planning Board or resign so I could speak against a policy that I believe would hurt Johns Creek.

That is unfair and it goes against the founding vision of our country.

There is a better way for the city to operate. We need to remove personal politics from the council. We need to encourage more engagement from the residents of Johns Creek. We need to allow anyone and everyone the right to speak their mind, including those who serve on boards.

It is not too late for the council to take on this approach, and I sincerely hope they do.

printPrint
emailEmail Link
CommentFeedback
shareShare

Tags: Community & Outreach

  1. report print email
    Vote for new representation
    August 19, 2013 | 10:15 PM

    Come November we should all vote for new people serving in the positions of Mayor and City Council if we are given a choice.

    An observer
    Johns creek
  2. report print email
    Well, Steve
    August 21, 2013 | 09:57 AM

    Well, Steve. this ethics code has been in existence since the birth of our city. Why didn't Mr. Bodker object to it when the city codes were first decided upon? Why is Mr. Bodker, only now, claiming that they should be changed? Why? because of the investigation?

    I am happy to see that the city members are standing firm on the codes that were adopted and that have been in place since the city's inception. One does not just go changing codes at one person's whim.

    It is obvious that you are a Bodker supporter. I am not! I am for fairness, honesty and justice. Seems like you, Steve, are not.

    Remove personal politics? I think that the investigation is doing just that!



    Voter in Johns Creek
    Johns Creek
  3. report print email
    What is the Charge?
    September 20, 2013 | 12:45 PM

    What is Bodker being investigated for? It seems to me like an election year witch hunt. Maybe I am being naive? But I have seen nothing in the news except a search for something and they did not find anything so now they will investigate his private life hoping to find something. What is it? Why all the secrecy?

    And "Voter in Johns Creek" ... why not be a supporter of the mayor? He has not even been accused of anything. Do you know something we don't? Is there a reason you don't support our mayor?

    Concerned JC CItizen
    Johns Creek
READER COMMENTS Submission
When posting feedback please be respectful. Be nice. :
* required value
Your Name*

Town*

Email (not shown on website)*

Subject*

Comment*

Verification*
Identify the animal




Coldwell Banker
Biz Post
RECENT CLASSIFIEDS
Office/ Business Equip./ Supplies

CLOTHING RACKS

August 26, 2014 | 10:25 AM
(3) collapsible, rolling »
Full-time

AutoCad drafting

August 26, 2014 | 10:02 AM
AutoCad 2D 2013 drafting »
Cemetery

3 Plots in Arlington Cemetery

August 25, 2014 | 06:17 PM
3 Plots in Arlington Cemetery, »

Beverage Depot
appen dec 2010 Duplicate