Northside Oral Surgery
appen dec 2010 Duplicate

Zoning decisions: Why can't they just say no?

March 04, 2014
As sometimes happens, I get emails from people who want to know why there is always so much contention about local zoning cases. They often see the decision as clear-cut (their side).

Why then is it so difficult for a city council to decide what to do in a particular zoning case? If dozens of city residents turn out to oppose it, shouldn't that be a clear signal to deny it?

In other words, why can't the city just say no?

This is not unusual since for many attendees it is their first foray into the arcane world of the city zoning arena. Regardless, the applicant is almost always the bad guy.

The owner of the property and the developer want to build a subdivision, say, on a road that is already full of subdivisions. Traffic is almost gridlocked every morning and evening with everyone going and coming from work, not to mention the school buses.

Many residents naturally don't want more crowding and congestion; others speak of enjoying the natural beauty of the applicant's property and how developing it would despoil the area.

Then why can't a city council simply inform this guy that the city is full-up on this road and tell him no dice?

These are some of the many objections raised in zoning cases. While I am not an expert by any means, in 29 years, I have covered more than 8,000 zoning cases in Fulton, DeKalb, Fayette, Forsyth and Paulding counties and the cities therein. Therefore, I can call on a lot of experience.

If the applicants look confident, it starts with Georgia law that strongly favors the individual's right to develop one's property.

If owners intend to use the land in much the same manner and at the same density as the developed property around them, they know Georgia law and the courts are on their side. To deny a property owner from developing his land in the same manner as his neighbors is usually deemed a "taking" of the value of their land in court.

Communities are required to create a comprehensive land use plan (CLUP) that gives all property owners a reasonable expectation of what they and their neighbors can do with their land.

A more intense use than allowed under the CLUP requires approval of a rezoning or a variance. This is to allow some leeway that might be due to unusual topographical features or other extenuating circumstances that recognize no land use plan can anticipate every eventuality. But the farther one strays from the CLUP, the riskier approval is.

The CLUP is the biggest tool a city has in preserving the property rights of applicants and the neighboring properties. It is also the best way for cities to avoid a property lawsuit. Judges weigh a city's reliance on the CLUP heavily in making zoning decisions.

A property may not have the same zoning as across the street when the CLUP is made. But if both sides of the street are entitled to the same range of uses under the CLUP – such as two units per acre – then both sides of the street can expect to exercise the same or similar uses under the CLUP.

Thus, while the neighbors perceive they are "negatively affected" by the new development, if the applicant's plan falls within the CLUP's guidelines – and is for instance the same development and density the neighbors have – any redress for those negatives normally must come from the city, not the applicant.

He has the same right to use the streets and other amenities that his neighbors do.

The city's responsibilities might mean more traffic lights, widening roads, improving intersections or whatever the city deems necessary, practical and affordable.

A city can't say there is no room for the applicant's project because he was merely the last one to build. Zoning is not a land rush where the city can stop a development or reduce the density. That is what the lawyers call "arbitrary and capricious," and judges tend to agree.

As for the investment that builders make in surveying the land, developing home elevations and other drawings, it is simply due diligence on the developer's part to understand the soundness of the investment.

For most of us, we are buying one home in an established subdivision. We already know what the house looks like, we know where the closets are, how big the yard is and what the amenities are.

But the developer has to know down to the square foot where it all will fit, how many homes it will yield. Obviously, it is often in the applicant's and developer's interests to maximize the density of the property. That is not the city's job.

Other factors such as stream buffers affect buildable area, and the city is entitled to reduce density to reflect that. It must decide what is best for all while upholding the CLUP.

A city planning commission and city planning staff are recommending bodies, and only the city councils have final say.

The council is caught in the middle most times in a contentious rezoning, and it is their job to be fair and equitable in all cases. Yes, there will be added congestion and more students for the schools. New development will also contribute to the tax digest, the sales tax and to the overall economy of the city.

It will be up to the council to determine how best to mitigate the negatives while exploiting the positives. City councils often wind up pleasing no one, and that probably means they did their job well.

Executive Editor, Appen Media.
emailEmail Link

Tags: Business News, Community & Outreach

  1. report print email
    Zoning Decisions
    March 07, 2014 | 06:04 PM

    Very well explained. All I would add is that Comprehensive Land Use Plans are generally not evaluated parcel by parcel when written. Occasionally, amendments and changes are in order if a more appropriate use is presented.

    Mike Kennedy
  2. report print email
    Zoning Decisions
    March 07, 2014 | 06:04 PM

    Very well explained. All I would add is that Comprehensive Land Use Plans are generally not evaluated parcel by parcel when written. Occasionally, amendments and changes are in order if a more appropriate use is presented.

    Mike Kennedy
  3. report print email
    Roll over and take it ..
    March 15, 2014 | 09:53 PM

    I just don't know where to start with this article and the response of Mike Kennidy. I see the simple kernel of truth to this story about georgia law CLUPS guidelines, but that about where the facts of this article end. In terms of "re zoning" our councilmen members DO have a right and an obligation to put the breaks on these developments, but the fact of the matter there is simply to much coruption going on. You're right a property owner DOES have the right to develop land as it currently stands "Agricultural" or otherwise . But when an owner asks to change the population density of the land it's GAME on. The counsel members that represent us
    DO have tools to require the developers to bare any additional burden on the community .. Our elected officials have the right to control density to the point where the a developer like Duke Land Group LLC, or Crown homes sees the transaction as no longer profitable.. However due to corruption, kick backs and inside deals guess who gets hurt ? Your right it's the existing home owner. People of these communities need to stand up and draw a darn line in the sand.. And when our elected cownclemen cower and fold like the cheap suits they ware, well we need to vote them out, I'll start with the useless sack of wasted space Pete Amos district 1. If they don't want to control population density and allow houses to be stacked on top of one another they are done serving the people .. I don't know what glass of kool-aid this writer is drinking out of, but our elected officials DONT have to lay down and take it !

    Mark Holbrook
  4. report print email
    March 15, 2014 | 10:19 PM

    People need to get over "density- phobia"
    "Density" is not bad.... Or good. It depends oh how and where and evaluating long and short term impact. Density - the right kind of density keeps taxes lower, supports economic stability and growth, and - in Alpharettas case, allows the provision of enough "retirement" housing to meet demand. If you want to see our retired population move elsewhere. Be careful what you ask for.

  5. report print email
    March 15, 2014 | 10:37 PM

    People need to get over all these propaganda artists. Density by every study IS a bad thing .. It brings MORE crime, that's right more then we already put up with day to day... Density brings MORE traffic on already over loaded roads that we sit in day in and day out .. Density is what was at the core of bubonic plague, and is what started what we currently calll urban sprawl of sub burbes. The reason there is so much corruption in this area is because the people who are having their pockets picked need to wake up.. Taxes don't go down when you over populate on top of an infulstucture that is MAX capacity, taxes go up because once these developers have made the quick buck and moved on it is you as the tax payer who will be asked fo support more TSPLOT taxs to improve roads that should have been tacked on to developers. Mark my words, these slimy polititioms are going to have their hands in EVERY tax payers pocket once these developers of cheap housing built by a labor force that don't speak a lick of English have moved on .

    Steve Pruitt
  6. report print email
    April 30, 2014 | 07:52 AM

    The fine people of Atlanta MSA can have density or they can have sprawl. It is simple math. The population of the sunbelt in general, and Atlanta in particular, is going up dramatically, like it or not. Density is smarter - less taxing on our air, water, and health - yes there have been studies. But if you prefer to just keep building roads and widening 400 and not providing a reasonably sized footprint for mass transit to ever take hold, no problem. Lets just get on with it.

When posting feedback please be respectful. Be nice. :
* required value
Your Name*


Email (not shown on website)*



Identify the animal

Coldwell Banker
Biz Post

Breakfast table and chairs

September 15, 2014 | 11:52 AM
Metal frame Glass top breakfast »
Garage Sale

Neighborhood Garage Sale

September 13, 2014 | 08:33 PM
Multi family yard sale in »
Moving Sale

Huge Moving Sale Hillbrooke Subdivision

September 13, 2014 | 11:37 AM
Saturday, September 20 »

Johns Creek Chamber
appen dec 2010